Loading...
Home > Informix Error > Informix Error No More Extents

Informix Error No More Extents

This method ensures you will not miss recreating any database objects dependant on the table ( synonyms, triggers, views, constraints, and so on ). Reply With Quote 03-19-02,18:08 #3 TblXtnt View Profile View Forum Posts Registered User Join Date Mar 2002 Posts 5 Originally posted by rnealejr Since you are only using 17 extents I User login Username: * Password: Remember me Create new accountRequest new password Frontpage Sponsor Main Frontpage Forum Jobs NewsStories RSS NewsfeedsCategoriesERP Geek Industry & Technology Opinion Security Sources Calendar Polls Shop December 06, 2010 9:27 PM Fernando Nunes said... have a peek at these guys

Once you notice you have a table with too many extents you can ask the engine to defragment it. If you are still seeking a solution, please respond ... An estimate of the maximum allowed number of extents is the page size in bytes, minus 150 bytes of overhead, divided by eight. Isto faz com que a sua gestão seja mais simples e eficiente. http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21395852

We are using Informix 7.31 on HP-UX 11i. Error Message of the dbaccess While Data Is Loaded At first, this sounds misleading since the table had only seven extents. Gorazd "Steven Kurlander" wrote in message news:4f7c9960.0309280830.578d2260posting.google.c om... > Hi, > > When inserting data into a table w_standard using Informix Dynamic > Server 9.30.FC2 running on a Sun E3000 TBLspace Report for ts_db:informix.w_standard Physical Address 1300005 Creation date 05/08/2003 20:11:15 TBLspace Flags 901 Page Locking TBLspace contains VARCHARS TBLspace use 4 bit bit-maps Maximum row size 2125 Number of special

  • You can run “oncheck –pt dbname:tablename” to find out if the problem is the number of extents or pages.  If the number of used pages is 16,777,215, then you have maxed
  • Uma partição (uma tabela tem uma ou mais partições) tem um ou mais extents.Antes de continuar, e para estabelecer uma comparação, gostaria de transmitir algum feedback que ao longo de anos
  • Esta é a razão porque a regra anterior pode não ser verificada na práctica.
  • The most > significant 2 digits is a0.
  • UDRs: In transaction? / Em transacção?
  • The time now is 17:41.
  • Thanks in advance.
  • December 07, 2010 10:35 AM Post a Comment Newer Post Older Post Home Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom) About Me Fernando Nunes Lisboa, Portugal domusonline at gmail.com I'm an IBMer and

Frontpage - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service ©2001-2016 - Baanboard.com - Baanforums.com Como em muitas outras situações, as coisas não são bem a preto e branco... Informix DataBlade Modules Loading... Therefore, the problem could only be solved with a self-written UDR that allows the conversion TEXT <--> CLOB and BYTE <--> BLOB in both directions.

Mein KontoSucheMapsYouTubePlayNewsGmailDriveKalenderGoogle+ÜbersetzerFotosMehrShoppingWalletDocsBooksBloggerKontakteHangoutsNoch mehr von GoogleAnmeldenAusgeblendete FelderNach Gruppen oder Nachrichten suchen Tuesday, 18 October 2016 login / logout Search Drastic Reduction of Possible Rows in a Table with TEXT and BYTE in The question now is whether the blob pages needed for a simple large object count towards this number.The Informix documentation says nothing about this. Hi everybody, I have the problem with a few lists and the generated error is: "Fatal error : Error 1136 (bdb_errno 1136) on tfgld410105 in db_insert(51)" I need help with that...I http://www.dbforums.com/showthread.php?325626-Error-136-No-more-extents Results 1 to 12 of 12 Thread: Error: 136 No more extents Tweet Thread Tools Show Printable Version Subscribe to this Thread… Search Thread Advanced Search Display Linear Mode Switch

The limit varies with the table definition and the disk-page size in use. Example output to oncheck -pt : TBLspace Report for dbase:informix.customer Physical Address 1:36878 Creation date 801 Page Locking TBLspace use 4 bit bit-maps Maximum row size 134 Number of special columns The error message is as follows: 271: Could not insert new row into the table. 136: ISAM error: no more extents This error message implies that the number of extents allocated Apesar de não estar no vídeo à direita, eu adoro o Informix.

Unfortunately, this is not displayed in the log files – the first place to look when trying to detect a problem. It reads: 2014-06-26 12:22:19 WARNING: partition 'testdb:informix.testtable': no more pages Text of the File $DBTEMP/$INFORMIXSERVER.alarm This message states exactly what has happened. Reply With Quote 01-04-05,05:18 #4 daljit_reck View Profile View Forum Posts Registered User Join Date Dec 2004 Location India Posts 4 I have found the problem. View my complete profile My tweets Tweets by @domusonline Informix 12.1! Subscribe To Posts Atom Posts Comments Atom Comments Links - IBM Informix Home - International Informix Users Group -

Each partition header is stored in exactly one Informix page. More about the author If the next extent size is X and the dbspace only has a maximum of Y (Y < X) informix will allocate Y and will not raise any error.If this happens Por outras palavaras é mais que provável que consiga atingir os 4GB com menos de 225 extents.Salvo algum erro, na versão 11.50 foi introduzida uma melhoria para prevenir a duplicação excessiva I think in total I had allocated no more than 75 extents.

Um cabeçalho de partição é uma página que contém cinco slots:Slot 1Este contém a estrutura da partição (coisas como a data de criação, flags, tamanho máximo de uma linha, numéro de Ele acrescentou, e cito: "Se há coisa que sempre admirei foi a maneira como o Informix gere os extents".Assim sendo, se um DBA de um cliente diz que admira a maneira Informix allows rows up to 32KB wide. http://renderq.net/informix-error/informix-error-229.php Forgot your password?

Register Forum Archives Databases Informix having problem with extents having problem with extents - Informix Hi, When inserting data into a table w_standard using Informix Dynamic Server 9.30.FC2 running on a The dbspace has chunks of size 2GB. Isto implica que o espaço livre para o slot cinco (a lista de extents) é variável.

Why isn't it a problem anymore?

Isso não significa que ignore alguns problemas que ele tem (ou tinha neste caso particular). There are two indices defined for the > table. This decreases the number of times it will try to allocate a new extent. I appreciate any comments, corrections and topic sugestions.

Estas são as razões porque tinhamos um limite e porque esse limite era variável. XIX000:-136:ISAM error: no more extents The table w_standard is defined as create table w_standard ( .... ) in wsc extent size 2097000 next size 2097000; The table is in dbspace wsc. However, what baffles us is the no more extents being allocated after 17 eventhough there are free chunks in the dbspace. http://renderq.net/informix-error/informix-error-329.php Our analysis shows that overall 220 extents can be allocated to this table and 17 extents have been allocated to this table till the error message.

Although I'm not in the video on the right, I do love Informix. Isto não era assim em versões anteriores. Se existirem, o tamanho ocupado dependerá da estrutura da tabela.Slot 4Contém a descrição de cada chave (se for um índice ou um mix). In order to find out whether blob pages count as data pages, we have created a 100GB-sized chunk.

Reply With Quote 12-31-04,03:22 #2 matute View Profile View Forum Posts Registered User Join Date Jun 2004 Location Madrid, Spain Posts 47 Hi, Have you checked (using oncheck -pt db:table ) bshell6.1> Brendan Shine View Public Profile Find all posts by Brendan Shine « Previous Thread | Next Thread » Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) Se não existirem colunas especiais (VARCHAR e BLOB) este slot estará vazio. However, when using the old simple large objects TEXT and BYTE in Informix, this is not the case.

A partition header is a page that contains 5 slots:Slot 1This contains the partition structure (things like creation date, partition flags, maximum row size, number of special columns - VARCHAR and If you are still seeking a solution, please respond ... Diagnosing the problem As user informix, run "oncheck -pt :

". For performance reasons it's better to keep them lowThe second great feature is an online table defragmenter.

The entry for > this table in systables is > > tabname w_standard > owner informix > partnum 10485762 > tabid 489 > rowsize 2125 > ncols 20 > nindexes 2 Thank you very very much Sir!

© Copyright 2017 renderq.net. All rights reserved.