NULL_RTX : reg); fixes the testcase. Make sure the type is not saturating and has the signedness of - the stripped operands, as fold_plusminus_mult_expr will re-associate. - ??? We > already had similar issues in the past (MEM_REF expansion on SPARC64, array > indexes on IA-64/VMS) but the bugs were in the RTL expansion. The other two messages you could see are: Environment variable DJGPP point to file `XXYYZZ' which doesn't exist or Environment variable DJGPP points to wrong or corrupt file `ABCDE' (In both navigate to this website
Comment 33 Eric Botcazou 2012-11-13 14:17:03 UTC > Can we limit > > (zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (FOO:SI) (const_int Y))) > > to > > (plus:DI (zero_extend:DI (FOO:SI)) (const_int Y)) > > transformation Using hid_basic with Harmony 1.08.01 Bootloader PIC32MZ EF Very strange exception [PIC18F2620] SPI Not Working All FAQs Basic Commands for OTAA Join Frequency Settings for EU 868 MHz, Plus Duty Law
This one character change, from POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED < 0 to POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED != 0 creates a working x32 GCC. You should upgrade to the latest CWSDPMI if you experience such problems, and if that doesn't help, bump up the size of CWSDPMI heap using CWSPARAM. For x86-64, it is -16*1023*1024.
Comment 4 Richard Biener 2011-02-01 11:50:39 UTC Sounds similar to other reports that build on i?86 without -msse and a target attribute that enables some more SSE features. Added: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr55142-1.c branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr55142-2.c Modified: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/config/i386/i386.c branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog Comment 39 Andrew Pinski 2014-05-30 02:22:41 UTC (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #37) > Hopefully. I was able to isolate the code causing the error in my case (using the sizeof operator on the third argument of the memcpy function) and submitted a support ticket (1-163827). But if during any of the following optimization passes set_cfun is called to some other function which has different target options, target_reinit is called, which calls free_after_compilation which will clear x_rtl.
As stated before, I've reported this to Dev Tools so this can offer a more meaningful error message (assuming that it can't simply be resolved). Internal compiler errors (a.k.a. OK for trunk? > > 2013-10-11 H.J. Edit: Sorry, I got the day wrong.
clang sometimes does better than gcc, but also trips up sometimes. –Peter Cordes Mar 5 at 4:45 | show 1 more comment Did you find this question interesting? Lu
Tested on x32. Still, an internal compiler error is not nearly as bad as silently generating bad code. #9 aschen0866 Super Member Total Posts : 4017 Reward points : 0 Joined: 2006/01/08 22:18:32Location: San Why v3.21 Beta when v3.21 is officially available for download? #6 nice Super Member Total Posts : 1013 Reward points : 0 Joined: 2004/09/18 11:42:25Location: Germany Status: offline RE: C30 3.21 When in doubt, always enlarge the compiler stack size.
OK for trunk? >>> >>> 2013-10-11 H.J. http://renderq.net/internal-compiler/internal-compiler-error-net.php GCC 4.7 only implements -maddress-mode=long equivalent. Lu 2012-10-31 13:10:02 UTC -maddress-mode=long is new in 4.8. Q: During compilation, GCC prints "Fatal: Error in DJGPP installation.
Q: GCC aborts with "Internal compiler error" when compiling a large C++ program. The problem is that tree_rest_of_compilation calls init_emit and lots of other init* functions and assumes x_rtl will stay initialized until expansion. But nowhere in those intrinsics calls do I see the name of a hardware register, so it must be filled in during code generation. –rici Mar 5 at 4:28 my review here Best regards, Bernd post edited by nice - 2009/12/07 15:32:25 #5 aschen0866 Super Member Total Posts : 4017 Reward points : 0 Joined: 2006/01/08 22:18:32Location: San Diego Status: offline RE: C30
Returns the folded tree or NULL if no simplification could be made. */ @@ -7048,6 +7066,17 @@ fold_plusminus_mult_expr (location_t loc, enum tree_code code, tree type, tree arg00, arg01, arg10, arg11; tree On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Uros Bizjak
add more RAM, or increase swap, or do something else on your system to improve this.
I am back on 3.20b... #1 20 Replies Related Threads JesperW Starting Member Total Posts : 80 Reward points : 0 Joined: 2009/04/27 10:49:24Location: Sweden Status: offline RE: C30 3.21 compiler Quote from : --quote-- I am checking in this patch, which only affects x32 and nothing else. I waited and waited for the v3.21 release (knowing those bugs you guys reported) before switching from my good old v3.12. Comment 2 Paul Howarth 2009-08-06 16:35:14 EDT Problem fixed in Rawhide and worked around in F-11 successfully - thanks.
Lu 2012-11-13 14:32:23 UTC A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg00991.html Comment 35 H.J. If you take a look at explow.c:669, you'll see the "offending" line. OK for trunk? Lu 2012-10-31 11:25:48 UTC Breakpoint 7, fold_binary_loc (loc=2696, code=PLUS_EXPR, type=0x7ffff199e000, op0=0x7ffff1ab8398, op1=0x7ffff1aa6660) at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/fold-const.c:10058 10058 return tem; (gdb) call debug_tree (arg0) output movl %ecx, -1073743664(%eax) even if the address is a PLUS in DImode. Still, an internal compiler error is not nearly as bad as silently generating bad code. Support x32 TLS address in > + DImode and Pmode in SImode. */ Copy the address to a Pmode register. Related 123Useful GCC flags for C1647Why doesn't GCC optimize a*a*a*a*a*a to (a*a*a)*(a*a*a)?109Clang vs GCC for my Linux Development project41GCC -g vs -g3 GDB Flag: What is the Difference?13What's the proper way Lu
output movl %ecx, -1073743664(%eax) even if the address is a PLUS in DImode. Still, an internal compiler error is not nearly as bad as silently generating bad code. Support x32 TLS address in > + DImode and Pmode in SImode. */ Copy the address to a Pmode register. Related 123Useful GCC flags for C1647Why doesn't GCC optimize a*a*a*a*a*a to (a*a*a)*(a*a*a)?109Clang vs GCC for my Linux Development project41GCC -g vs -g3 GDB Flag: What is the Difference?13What's the proper way